6.5 Definite Integral

Theorem 6.20 (Definite Integral). Let \(f(z)\) be analytic in a simply connected domain \(D\), let \(F(z)\) be an antiderivative of \(f(fz)\). Then for any two points \(z_0, \, z_1\); in \(D\) \[\int _{z_0}^{z_1} f(z)dz = F(z_1) - F(z_0)\]

Proof. Let \(C\) be any contour in \(D\) from \(z_0\) to \(z_1\), parametrised by \(z(t)\) for \(a\leq t\leq b\) with \(z(a)=z_0\) and \(z(b)=z_1\). By the chain rule the composite \(F(z(t))\) has derivative \[\frac {d}{dt}F\big (z(t)\big )=F'\big (z(t)\big )z'(t)=f\big (z(t)\big )z'(t),\] which is exactly the integrand of the contour integral. Hence, by the fundamental theorem of calculus applied to the real and imaginary parts, \[\int _C f(z)\,dz=\int _a^b f\big (z(t)\big )z'(t)\,dt =\Big [F\big (z(t)\big )\Big ]_a^b=F(z_1)-F(z_0).\]

Two consequences are worth naming. The value depends only on the endpoints, so the integral is path independent in \(D\); and taking \(z_1=z_0\) gives \(\int _C f=0\) around any closed contour, which is Cauchy’s theorem in the presence of an antiderivative. □

Example 6.21. Evaluate

1.
\(\displaystyle {\int _{1 + i}^{2 + i} e^{2z}dz}\)

\(f(z) = e^{2z}\quad , \quad F(z) = \frac {1}{2}e^{2z}\)

\(\displaystyle {\int _{1 + i}^{2 + i} e^{2z}dz = \frac {1}{2}e^{2(2+i)} - \frac {1}{2}e^{2(1 + i)} = \frac {1}{2}e^{2i}\Big [ e^4 - e^2\Big ]}\)

2.
\(\displaystyle {\int _1^{2 + 3i} \sinh 3z dz}\)

\(f(z) = \sinh 3z\quad , \quad F(z) = \frac {1}{3}\cosh 3z\)

\begin {align*} \int _1^{2 + 3i} \sinh 3z dz & = \frac {1}{3}\cosh 3(2 + 3i) - \frac {1}{3}\cosh 3(i)\\\\ & = \frac {1}{3}\Bigg [\frac {e^{3(2 + 3i)} + e^{-3(2 + 3i)}}{2} - \frac {e^3 + e^{-3}}{2}\Bigg ]\\\\ \end {align*}

Questions on this section

Stuck on something here? Ask below and it stays attached to this topic.