12.1 Decisions under uncertainty

A decision problem has actions \(a_1, \ldots , a_m\), states of nature \(\theta _1, \ldots , \theta _n\), and a payoff \(P_{ij}\) for action \(a_i\) in state \(\theta _j\). With no probabilities for the states, several criteria are in use, each expressing an attitude to risk:

  • maximin (Wald): choose the action whose worst payoff is largest, the pessimist’s rule;
  • maximax: choose the action whose best payoff is largest, the optimist’s;
  • Hurwicz: maximise \(\alpha \max _jP_{ij} + (1 - \alpha )\min _jP_{ij}\) for a chosen coefficient of optimism \(\alpha \);
  • minimax regret (Savage): with the regret \(R_{ij} = \max _kP_{kj} - P_{ij}\), the amount lost by not choosing the best action for state \(j\), minimise the largest regret;
  • Laplace: treat the states as equally likely and maximise the average payoff.

Example 12.1.1. A firm can build a large, medium or small plant; demand will be high, medium or low. The payoffs (Rs. lakh) are

high medium low
large \(200\) \(50\) \(-120\)
medium \(120\) \(80\) \(-30\)
small \(60\) \(40\) \(20\)

Maximin chooses the small plant (worst case \(20\)), maximax the large (\(200\)), Hurwicz with \(\alpha = 0.6\) the large (\(72\) against \(60\) and \(44\)), and minimax regret and Laplace the medium plant, whose largest regret is \(80\) against \(140\) for the other two (Software 12.4.1). The criteria disagree because they answer different questions.

Questions on this section

Stuck on something here? Ask below and it stays attached to this topic.