1.8 Practice Problems

Problem 1.8.1. Let \(X\) be any non-empty set and define \[d(x,y) = \begin {cases} 0, & x=y,\\ 1, & x\neq y.\end {cases}\] Show that \(d\) is a metric, describe the open balls, and deduce which subsets of \(X\) are open.

Show solution

Solution. Non-negativity and symmetry are immediate, and \(d(x,y)=0\) exactly when \(x=y\) by definition. For the triangle inequality, if \(x=z\) the left side is \(0\) and there is nothing to prove; if \(x\neq z\) then \(y\) cannot equal both \(x\) and \(z\), so at least one of \(d(x,y)\), \(d(y,z)\) is \(1\) and the right side is at least \(1\).

The open balls are \[B(x;r) = \begin {cases}\{x\}, & r\leq 1,\\ X, & r>1.\end {cases}\] Since \(\{x\} = B\left (x;\tfrac 12\right )\) is open for every \(x\), and every subset is a union of its singletons, every subset of \(X\) is open. This is the discrete topology.

Problem 1.8.2. Show that in any metric space an open ball is an open set.

Show solution

Solution. Let \(y\in B(x;r)\), so \(d(x,y)<r\). Put \(\delta = r - d(x,y) > 0\). If \(z\in B(y;\delta )\) then \[d(x,z) \leq d(x,y) + d(y,z) < d(x,y) + \delta = r ,\] so \(z\in B(x;r)\). Hence \(B(y;\delta )\subseteq B(x;r)\), and as \(y\) was arbitrary \(B(x;r)\) is open.

The proof is worth remembering as the model of its type: every openness argument in a metric space produces a \(\delta \) from the triangle inequality in exactly this way, and the choice \(\delta = r - d(x,y)\) is the natural one because it measures the room left.

Problem 1.8.3. Give an example of a collection of open sets in \(\mathbb {R}\) whose intersection is not open, and explain why this does not contradict the axioms.

Show solution

Solution. Take \(U_n = \left (-\tfrac 1n,\ \tfrac 1n\right )\) for \(n=1,2,3,\dots \) Each is open, and \[\bigcap _{n=1}^{\infty }U_n = \{0\},\] since \(0\) lies in every \(U_n\) while any \(x\neq 0\) fails to lie in \(U_n\) once \(n>1/\left |x\right |\). The singleton \(\{0\}\) is not open in \(\mathbb {R}\), because no interval about \(0\) is contained in it.

There is no contradiction: the axioms permit arbitrary unions but only finite intersections. This example is precisely why the restriction to finitely many is there, and it is the mirror image of the closed-set example \(\bigcup _n\left [\tfrac 1n,1\right ] = (0,1]\).

Questions on this section

Stuck on something here? Ask below and it stays attached to this topic.